Re: the use of DLR_IS_ENABLED macro on smsbox.c

Hi,

sounds resonable for me... Can you please send clean unified patch against 
cvs? Thanks... (like: cvs diff -Nau )

On Friday 26 September 2003 00:57, adi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 07:32:03AM +0700, adi wrote:
> > I wonder why should that macro being check on
> > url_result_thread(). The existing code would cause
> > the message (the response) would never be sent, if
> > one enable X-Kannel-DLR-Mask.
>
> Seems that noone would be interested with question :-)
>
> Here is my proposed patch for smsbox.c suppose to not
> to simply drop the msg with dlr_mask not empty.
>
> Please comments.
>
> Regards,
>
> P.Y. Adi Prasaja

-- 
Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109

email: [email protected]
web: www.centrium.de
msn: [email protected]
icq: 98063111
___________________________________________

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html