Re: [FYI] billing identifier/information proxying

Hi Paul,

Paul Keogh wrote:
> 
> > In EMI2 we forward the XSer 0c field and in SMPP we forward the
> > service_type from the deliver_sm.
> >
> 
> The EMI-UCP specification suggests that this field is reserved for
> future use.
> 
> What syntax are you using for this field and is it operator specific ?

AFAIS, EMI 4.0 says that fields beyond 0c, which means 0d-ff are
reserved for future use.

0c is explicetly defined to be an "billing identifier" field.

Stipe

[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are