Re: SMPP broken in cvs-20031016?

"Alex Kinch" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <005801c3949d$b77350b0$0501a8c0@alex>
Scrub that last email, I've just re-read the SMPP specs - and even the
provider's documentation agrees! They say that the source_addr_ton should be
0x00 if there's a + prefix on it, and 0x01 if there's no prefix.

I've told them anyway, we'll see what they come up with.

Alex

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Kinch" <[email protected]>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>; "Alexander Malysh"
<[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: SMPP broken in cvs-20031016?


> Hi Stipe and Alex
>
> Apologies, I should have really looked through the message in more detail
> :-)
>
> Looking at the SMPP 3.4 docs, a ton value of 0x01 is "international".
Should
> it therefore be 0x101 (Alphanumeric) if there's a "+" prefix?
>
> I've spoken to the provider, and I seem to be the only customer out of
> around 500 SMPP connections that's noticed this :-)  I've provided them
with
> my Kannel debug logs and told them to go fix it! Thanks for the patch
Alex,
> I'll give it a try in a minute.
>
> Alex
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
> To: "Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Alex Kinch" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:32 PM
> Subject: Re: SMPP broken in cvs-20031016?
>
>
> > Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > >
> > > have you notice a command status in deliver_sm_resp? it's 0x0a ==
> Invalid
> > > source address. And see source address in deliver_sm: '+' in front
which
> is
> > > not allowed.
> > >
> > > So you should try to contact telco and tell them that smsc is broken.
> > > And second: please try attached patch that just implements a
workaround
> for
> > > this mess ;)
> >
> > yep, Alex is right here. Haven't checked the PDU that pedantically as
> > he did ;)
> >
> > The source_addr_ton specifies 0x01 which means no prefixing at all.
> > And the + prefix is hance *not* protocoll conform.
> >
> > Alex, to put this vendor on a "black list", which one is it?
> >
> > Stipe
> >
> > [email protected]
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Wapme Systems AG
> >
> > Vogelsanger Weg 80
> > 40470 Düsseldorf
> >
> > Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> > Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> >
> > E-Mail: [email protected]
> > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > wapme.net - wherever you are
> >
> >
> >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.