WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn , version: kannel-cvs

//Gentoo linux, kannel-cvs, just upgraded 2 days ago.


Hi, Thanks for all your quick replies earlier, very kind indeed.

I've now run into another problem that I didn't have with the development
version so I'm confused to why this is a problem...
All I've done is send a message to my modem and the following happens:

bearerbox
------------------------------
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [7] DEBUG: AT2[wavecom_1]: <-- +CMT: ,22
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [7] DEBUG: AT2[wavecom_1]: <-- 
0791449737019037040C914487616 3200100003011508100510003EE371C
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [7] DEBUG: AT2[wavecom_1]: Numeric sender
(international) <+ XXXXXXXX>
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [7] DEBUG: AT2[wavecom_1]: --> AT+CNMA^M
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [10] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box: <127.0.0.1>
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [10] DEBUG: boxc_sender: sent message to <127.0.0.1>
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [9] WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn for message to
<+XXXXXXXX>, rejected.
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [9] WARNING: Message rejected by bearerbox, no router!
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [9] DEBUG: send_msg: sending msg to box: <127.0.0.1>
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got ack
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 1 messages and 1 acks to store
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [7] DEBUG: AT2[wavecom_1]: <-- OK
2003-11-05 18:02:33 [0] DEBUG: Main Thread: Nothing todo.
2003-11-05 18:02:43 [0] DEBUG: Main Thread: Nothing todo.
2003-11-05 18:02:53 [0] DEBUG: Main Thread: Nothing todo.
2003-11-05 18:02:57 [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: heartbeat with load value 0
receiv ed
----------------------------
smsbox
-----------------------------
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [4] INFO: Starting to service <nop> from <+XXXXXXXX> to
<1234>
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [4] DEBUG: formatted text answer: <test1>
2003-11-05 18:02:32 [4] DEBUG: message length 14, sending 1 messages

now the:
"2003-11-05 18:02:32 [9] WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn " is clearly a major
problem... any ideas on why this might be?
 has something else like the at2/at change happened in the cvs version?


Again thanks a lot for any help in this matter, I know I'm probably more
pain than anything else but I hope to be able to help others once I
understand all this,
Cheers,
Jarl