Re: Another broken SMSC DLR implementation?

Thanks Dave

How would giving the binds the same SMSC-ID affect a request to suspend a particular connection, or if one of the connections goes down? We're binding four connections on one instance of bearerbox to two smpp systems on this provider, as explained on a previous mail one on each system for alpha sender and one on each system for numeric sender.

Alex
  ----- Original Message ----- 

  From: David Tully 
  To: [email protected] ; Alex Kinch 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:05 PM
  Subject: Re: Another broken SMSC DLR implementation?


  Sounds like a provider issue..

  We have a provider that does just this - delivers DLRs on one bind that
  relate to another bind. I get round this by giving the binds the same
  SMSC-ID.

  Dave.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Alex Kinch
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:54 PM
  Subject: Another broken SMSC DLR implementation?


  Before I start ranting, this is a question - and not a statement, so please
  don't flame me if I'm wrong! :-)

  If you have multiple SMPP connections to a provider, shouldn't the DLRs come
  back on the connection that the message was sent out on? We're having an
  issue with one of our providers that DLRs are coming back on the wrong SMPP
  connection, so Kannel is ignoring them.

  The only way I've found of fixing it so far is disabling the other three
  connections, so the only way they can return the DLRs is through the
  originating connection.

  Any suggestions?

  Alex