Re: [PATCH] Naive approach to HTTP-timeouts (Final?)

Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Organization Centrium GmbH
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi David/Slava,

as you know, I do not like "yet another thread" (YAT) approach...
Would you please try get some benchmark results w/ and w/o YAT, so we can see 
how is performance w/o YAT affected?

Thanks in advance...

On Thursday 27 November 2003 15:02, David Schmitz wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> attached is the IMHO final version of the timeout-patch.  I took the
> thread-approach as discussed with Slava (thanks for your input and help
>
> :)). If there are no objections/corrections I would like to commit the
>
> patch.
>
> Note: configuration of the timeout-values is done in http.h.
>
> Best regards,
> David

-- 
Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109

email: [email protected]
web: www.centrium.de
msn: [email protected]
icq: 98063111
___________________________________________

Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.