Re: [PATCH] Naive approach to HTTP-timeouts (Final?)

hey, factor 50???? I want see a patch w/o YAT!!!
It can't be soooo bad... 

On Thursday 27 November 2003 17:24, David Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> your YAT-hatred ;) is well known and understood. See the attachment for
> some naive benchmarks. Please draw your own conclusions.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> Alexander Malysh schrieb:
> >Hi David/Slava,
> >
> >as you know, I do not like "yet another thread" (YAT) approach...
> >Would you please try get some benchmark results w/ and w/o YAT, so we can
> > see how is performance w/o YAT affected?
> >
> >Thanks in advance...
> >
> >On Thursday 27 November 2003 15:02, David Schmitz wrote:
> >>Hi list,
> >>
> >>attached is the IMHO final version of the timeout-patch.  I took the
> >>thread-approach as discussed with Slava (thanks for your input and help
> >>
> >>:)). If there are no objections/corrections I would like to commit the
> >>
> >>patch.
> >>
> >>Note: configuration of the timeout-values is done in http.h.
> >>
> >>Best regards,
> >>David

-- 
Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109

email: [email protected]
web: www.centrium.de
msn: [email protected]
icq: 98063111
___________________________________________

Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html