RE: [PATCH] octstr performance

Browsed through your patch and couldn't find any boo-boo's with a bare eye.
const parameters are always good... you never know when you are going to
need a const, later.

+1 from me

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Alexander Malysh
Sent: maandag 19 januari 2004 12:56
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] octstr performance


Hi List,

attached is a patch that adds more 'const' modifiers to 'Octstr' and get
better 'octstr' performance (some functions were hand-optimized but not all,
means more work should be done;)). Also you can find some simple benchmarks
in attached .txt file.

Comments and votes please!

--
Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109

email: [email protected]
web: www.centrium.de
msn: [email protected]
icq: 98063111
___________________________________________

Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html