Re: [PATCH] dlr_mem.c & dlr_sdb.c check for dst

On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 16:23, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, wouldn't be better to normalize destination taken from dlr body?
> 
> nope: (1) too much configuration; (2) why should we do it, when we have a way 
> to avoid user intervention?
> 
In the end, either way is ok for me.  however, i kind of think it makes
more sense to normalize the destination number in the dlr_find method.  
that way the same normalization process (unified_prefix) is used for all
phone numbers everywhere.  we don't then have a special way of treating
the phone number just for dlrs (also then being able to use the less
costly "=" rather than "like" in the SQL).   and it doesn't require any
configuration or user intervention beyond what the user would normally
do for his MO/MT messages.

any comments?
nick