Re: [PATCH] dlr_mem.c & dlr_sdb.c check for dst

> 1) how want you guess a unified prefix in dlr_find when user has not
supplied
> unified prefix in the config file? (and that means user intervention).

There is a way: normalize number to internal format in dlr_add also, before
insert to database.
(it could be even stripping prefix like in Alex magic)
I think that if there is a way to avoid "like" especially with '%' at the
beginning, it should be done.

> 2) we should do this magic only because we want to find our dlr entry in
the
> DB, after this we have destination number equal supplied by user (see
> dlr_find:398)

The magic Alex proposed:
> >     int strip = (octstr_len(dst) > 10 ? octstr_len(dst) - 10 :
> > (octstr_len(dst) > 7 ? octstr_len(dst) - 7 : 0));

wouldn't work for me,  this one would be ok:

int strip = (octstr_len(dst) > 9 ? octstr_len(dst) - 9 :
(octstr_len(dst) > 7 ? octstr_len(dst) - 7 : 0));

will it work for everyone?

I would rather vote for internal dst normalization, to avoid 'like'
operator.

Regards
Robert