Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: mBlox SMPP optional parameters
Nisan Bloch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi yes, it would be useful to get more info back - I have some recent patches (last few weeks) that deal with some of these. These are still under testing on our side. I will release as soon as possible. As for publishing with SMPP.org and hoping that the aggregators and operators will fall in line - mm I doubt it :-) - look at the variation in deliver_sm dlr text formats, look at the various non standard uses of smpp params.... nisan At 04:01 PM 2004/07/14, Peter Beckman wrote: >What I'd love to see is this. From Table 5-7 in the Kannel 1.3.1 >documentation, add these fields: > > %m message_id returned by remote SMSC > %o command_id returned by SMSC > %O command_status returned by SMSC > >This way, anyone can write a handler using the DLR reporting, and we can >all make it specific to what we need. No sense in changing kannel for >vendor-specifics. > >The problem is that if the command_status is anything other than 0x0, >kannel believes correctly that there was some sort of error. I haven't >looked at v4 or v5, but there needs to be a way to communicate information >back from the SMSC other than what would be considered an "error" in the >command_status. We don't want to foul-up command_id. > >So lets write one that we can all use. > >0x00000400 Message Billed (OK) >0x000004A0 Message Unbillable >0x000004A1 MSISDN Blacklisted >0x000004A2 Carrier Invalid (Number Portability) > >I'm not thinking clearly, but its a start. I'll look at the patch and see >what responses people want. > >I think we should write and publish a spec, give it to the SMPP org even, >for this sort of thing. If we can get SMPP to publish it, the carriers and >aggregators should fall in line. Hopefully. > >Beckman > >On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > > Nisan Bloch - Clickatell wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ian > > > > > > part of the problem here is that each vendor will then have their own > > > proprietary settings, > > > now most of us who use kannel for high volume messaging and have many > links > > > running and external applications that handle the routing - this > would then > > > mean that the routing apps would need to have specific knowledge of the > > > optional/proprietary settings for each gateway. Part of the idea of > Kannel > > > is to abstract the links so external apps do not need to know anything > > > about the various protocols and connections. Then the next issue is > how to > > > pass these through from smsbox. > > > > > > so -1 for this going to CVS, > > > > I couldn't have frazed it clearer ;). Thanks Nisan. > > > > Same for me: -1 in adding spefiic vendor things to SMPP. > > > > Ian: you can think of how we could leaverage the SMPP module to > > "handle" vendor specific things. Like a dependency SMPP client > > implementation modole. But this is way out of scope currently for the > > group I guess. > > > > Stipe > > > > mailto:[email protected] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Wapme Systems AG > > > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > > 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany > > > > phone: +49.211.74845.0 > > fax: +49.211.74845.299 > > > > mailto:[email protected] > > http://www.wapme-systems.de/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) > > > > mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS > > OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2 > > nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT > > dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv > > bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID > > AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl > > OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ > > K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H > > g2HyLAEKQIp30Q== > > =aYCI > > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Peter Beckman Internet Guy >[email protected] http://www.purplecow.com/ >---------------------------------------------------------------------------