Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

"Pedro B." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bruno said he had to do the pack before August 13th.

I swear i looked at the calendar just now and appeared to me that 1 week 
from now is past August 13th.

\\pb

Stipe Tolj wrote:

> Alexander Malysh wrote:
> 
>> Hello Bruno,
>>
>> 1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first 
>> before
>> we can call it stable (IMO) and cvs version (before 1.3.2) was not tested
>> by too much people, so we should wait a bit...
>>
>> P.S. why not package 1.3.2 for debian and get it more testing?
>>
>> Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any complain about 1.3.2 in comparison with 1.2.1 ?
>>>
>>> What do you think about releasing 1.3.2 as 1.2.2 stable so I can package
>>> it for Debian and we could have the "latest stable" version in Sarge ?
>>>
>>> Stipe ?
> 
> 
> I'd like to go for the 1.4 stable branch, rather then having this "major 
> step" under 1.2.
> 
> This is historically also been made for 1.3 devel branch.
> 
> So, I'd like to see 1.4.0 stable rolled in about a week, to give people 
> time to identify any remaining open issues and get the issues out of the 
> BTS too.
> 
> Stipe
> 
> 
> mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wapme Systems AG
> 
> Vogelsanger Weg 80
> 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> phone: +49.211.74845.0
> fax: +49.211.74845.299
> 
> mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
> http://www.wapme-systems.de/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin)
> 
> mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS
> OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2
> nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT
> dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv
> bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID
> AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl
> OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ
> K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H
> g2HyLAEKQIp30Q==
> =aYCI
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.