Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

Pedro B. wrote:

> Speaking of spellchecking....
> 
> The official docs still include a plethora of minor grammar errors.
> Does anyone feel this should be corrected? I've been doing some 
> translation work lately, and since i'm in the "mood", i could go through 
> it gladly.
> It's not definitely a serious issue like bugs, although some of them can 
> provide a good laugh ("usefull" and "spesific" come to mind), thus 
> making it a credibility issue.
> 
> \\pb
> 
> 
> Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> 
>> Stipe Tolj wrote:
>>
>>> Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
>>>> "All apps have bugs"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> that's no. 7 of murphy's law, right? ;)
>>>
>>>> I'm seeing two patches from 1.3.2 to HEAD, and they seem fine to me. 
>>>> I'm fixing now the double recode bug.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't mind, I'll call it 1.4.0 then.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd appritiate ;)
>>
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=appritiate&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
>> Did you mean: appreciate
>> :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>