Re: [PATCH] include destination into dlr lookup

Hi,

sorry for delay...

Enver ALTIN wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 17:07 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>> > I believe avoiding use of `like` in SQL statements is better.
>> 
>> it's impossible to avoid `like` by indirect lookup... if it's
>> possible, please teach me ;)
> 
> Walking upstairs from subway this morning, I remembered this and thought
> that storing everything stripped and making strict comparison with
> stripped data would work.
> 
> So we would INSERT a DLR record with stripped destination and
> UPDATE/DELETE/SELECT would get a stripped destination for WHERE clause.
> 
> What do you think?

I don't like the idea of bloating the db and we will not win too much
performance (IMHO)... (we should really make benchmarks with
direct/indirect db lookup)

-- 
Thanks,
Alex