Re: [PATCH] preliminary confirmed sendsms

Hi Kalle,

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:52 +0300, Kalle Marjola wrote:
> So, what does this first version do:
> Instead of immediately saying '202 Send' for valid sendsms request, this
> patch waits for bearerbox ACK before replying to HTTP client.
> Valid replies are based on msg.h and are now:
> 202 0: Accepted for delivery (routed to SMSC driver)
> 202 3: Queued for later delivery (all SMSCes currently down)
> 403 Forbidden (no SMSC comfigured to accept this, fix something)
> 503 Service unavailable (queue full or other problem. Try again later)
> 
> This is still far from ideal (to get SMSC reply), but better
> than earlier. And this is how it should have been, always,
> as why else these is those 'ack' type messages flying around...
> (currently they are just discarded)

I'm all for this. Actually I had to use DLR for an application I have
developed, this gives a way better and immediate result about what
happened about the transaction.

So, choice-a is good enough and if I get the patch correctly, it is
indeed backwards compatible; which is better.

Thanks a lot, keep up the great work.
-- 
Enver ALTIN                   |        http://skyblue.gen.tr/
Software developer @ Parkyeri |      http://www.parkyeri.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBZgOmZCB2FZvqK0sRAu7hAJ4/zFFmn1TAWkF9M7FoWgDK5wnJFQCaAie3
sD1y48ITEc6DnZl6vS6dGcA=
=w/v7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----