Re: Kannel tested on Red Hat Linux 9 ?

Kalle Marjola wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 06:25, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'd suggest you to use 1.3.2. It is as stable as 1.2.1 but it's a lot
>>more functional.
>>
> 
> This reminds: could we get new stable release at some point?
> (new devel release wouldn't hurt that much either ... no matter
> if there has not been many updates, we could simply say like
> '1.3.3 is almost like 1.3.2, no need to upgrade unless...)
> 
> Maybe just release 1.3.2 as 1.4.0, perhaps with some little patches..
> (is there?)
> This way more probably we would get rid of 1.2.x based problems
> on lists.

yep, agreed. People still tend to pick 1.2.1 since it is "stable" 
rather then 1.3.2 devel... and that one is "way beyond" more stable 
then 1.2.1.

I'll go for 1.4.0 stable today and release it... if no short-cut 
objections here.

Stipe

mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299

mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------