Re: [PATCH] Kannel bug #0000032 otherwise known as kannel's list function naming clashes with latest mysql list function naming
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Davy Chan wrote: > **>To: [email protected] > **>From: Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> > **>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kannel bug #0000032 otherwise known as kannel's > list > **> function naming clashes with latest mysql list function naming > **>Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:02:28 +0100 > **> > **>Hi, > **> > **>Davy Chan wrote: > **> > **>> Well, it's been about 12 days since I tried to submit the patch > **>> but it still has not been acted on by the moderator of the > **>> [email protected] mailing list. > **> > **>I'm not aware of any moderator... > > This mailing list has been configured with a 100KB max message > size. Mailman (the list admin program) will block the email > and wait for the list admin (or mailman admin) to release the > message...or the list admin should send a message about why > it was rejected. Check out my email to the list: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04054.html heh, that was clear to me... I meant: I'm not aware of any _person_ that does ML moderation. > > **>> Are there any other suggestions on how to submit this patch > **>> for review? > **> > **>mantis should fine... the patch is just too big and need some time for > **>review... > > I understand that this HUGE patch needs time for review. But, I wasn't > even at the stage were people could review it. It was blocked. > And I didn't see any comments on the Mantis System about acknowledgement > and review of the patch. And, seeing as how this patch is > VERY large and will affect not only Kannel development but anyone > using the gwlib for development...I figured I should poke people > again about this. > > This problem has been sitting in the bug list since June 5th, 2004. > The person that orginally submitted the bug <i2sms> supplied a patch which > was rejected since it wasn't complete. Alex (I don't know which one) > added this comment on the original submitted patch by <i2sms> on Dec 10: > > Hi, unfortunately a) it's not a complete patch; b) please use > gwlist_XXX. TODO: > the whole list.[ch] should be changed to gwlist_XXX. > > care to make a patch? yep, that was me... alex == alexander malysh ;) > > So I did. thanks! I will try to review things this weekend... sorry real life and as usual too busy. > > See ya... > > d.c. -- Thanks, Alex