Re: [PATCH] Siemens SX1 kludge

Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:

> Ok well, yes I know I was offline fot _too_ _long_. I can't promise I
> will not do the same again :)
> 
> Now, to the kannel. Guess what Siemens SX1 latest firmware sends in
> request headers? It sends an \0x80 \0x00! Of course kannel is unable
> to do anything useful, because Accept for application/...wmlc is below
> that line, so voila.
> 
> I don't know is this handset behavior conforms to wsp spec, or not 
> (have no time to check yet). But anyway, we have plenty of these here,
> and users report that they are aple to browse through our competitors.

hmm, trying to understand this really.

The Siemens device sends 0x80 0x00 within the WSP headers, which means 0x80 is 
the coded value for 'Accept' and 0x00 is end?

Can you drop us the wapbox.log in debug log-level for this? I'd like to review 
it before having a go for commiting phone-specific kludges to kannel.

BTW, what GW are the competitors using? I can't emagine that they use a 
commercial gateway that has been addopted that fast a kludge for the specific 
handset, right? So the question is if the Siemens is really behaving 
protocol-conform or not, IMO.

Stipe

mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299

mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------