Re: Kannel concatenation bug & Q
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>
Hi,
On 26.1.2005, at 03:04, Oscar Medina Duarte wrote:
> Hi list !
>
> I'm doing some tests with Kannel's concatenation, and there are two
> things I found relevant (4 me al least).
>
> First, messages part of a concatenated message have a 159 chars long
> message body (Including headers), while IMO (cause I dont remember that
> being an issue in concatenation specs {ETSI TS 03.40 v7.5.0 @
> 9.2.3.24})
> should/could be 160, in this case, for me it seems like we are not
> using
> one char per message.
>
> Second, in all of the "not last" messages of a concatenated long
> message, there are 5 bytes at the end that look like a IE for me, those
> are : 0x04 0x26 0x00 0x01 0x01. I dont have a clue on what that IE
> looking might be, could some one please tell me?
This cannot be IE. First byte would be information element identifier,
second
information element length. So (8 byte) concatenation IE should start
with
0x00 0x03.
Kannel would not split an escaped character, so sometimes segments can
be
shorter.
Aarno