Re: [Fwd: Requesting DLR for binary messages]

Er... I'm not sure if I understand the question... so if I'm answering
the wrong thing... please excuse... ;-)))

Correct me if I'm wrong... but I thought DLR was specific to the SMSC
protocol. e.g. SMPP 3.4 Issue 1.2 p.124 / 5.2.17 registered_delivery 
*not* in the UDH.

So the value of dlr-mask *should* work. I haven't used this in a long
time... so I could be completely wrong... 


Looks OK for smsc_smpp.c:

    /* ask for the delivery reports if needed */
    if (DLR_IS_SUCCESS_OR_FAIL(msg->sms.dlr_mask))
        pdu->u.submit_sm.registered_delivery = 1;
    else if (DLR_IS_FAIL(msg->sms.dlr_mask) && !DLR_IS_SUCCESS(msg->sms.dlr_mask))
        pdu->u.submit_sm.registered_delivery = 2;


What do you mean by "delivery tracking bits"? ;-P


On Wednesday, 2005-02-02 at 01:16:09 AM, Enver ALTIN scribbled:
> Hi,
> 
> Forwarding here with hope to find an answer :)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Enver ALTIN <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Requesting DLR for binary messages
> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:39:10 +0200
> Hi,
> 
> I'm developing an application which sends binary messages with UDH, and
> I'd love to add delivery tracking bits here and there.
> 
> Seems like DLR-related stuff is transmitted in UDH, and that's what I'm
> overriding so Kannel's dlr-mask just doesn't seem to work.
> 
> What can I do? What actually I'm looking for is a brief 10-lines
> explanation about that, which fields of UDH are used for what. Alex
> suggested me to take a look at ETSI 03.38 and 03.40, although they look
> a bit like Cyrillic to me ;)
> 
> Any clues?
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> -- 
> Enver ALTIN                   |        http://skyblue.gen.tr/
> Software developer @ Parkyeri |      http://www.parkyeri.com/



-- 
Benjamin Lee
Melbourne, AU         +61.4.16.BEN.LEE         http://www.realthought.net/
Open Source / Linux / BSD
__________________________________________________________________________
Only a fool has no doubts.