Re: Kannel is suffering

Dear Aarno Syvänen and Stipe Tolj. 

Thank you, I appreciate your comments. They are fully validating my observations.

You are busy preserving the 'pure' design instead of thinking forward.
In that way Kannel will die.

You may distingush between 'lowest common denominator' and 'abstraction', but, please,
explain why the two concepts are equal in Kannel ? 

Frequently the efforts seen here are not to abstract, but to turn down suggestions,
because they are not present in all protocols. That is not abstraction. That is backward
thinking. Kannel would benefit from some real abstraction efforts with a forward view of
supporting all protocols to each their fullest extent.

- Jørgen Thomsen