Re: [RFC] sqlbox as own cvs module - votes please

I think I qualify as one of the "others not being forbidden to mention
their votes as part of an open way in decission making" :) but anyway,
since I like this module a lot:

+1

Regards,

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:56:07 +0100, Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> to gain cvs write access
> in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module.
> 
> He is willing to put it under Kannel projection and maintain it inside the cvs
> module. Which would also allow easier participation of other developers in
> interest of it.
> 
> So, we need at least 2 more +1 votes from core developers with cvs write access
> to get hime going. Votes please.
> 
> (Which does not mean others are forbidden to mention their votes as part of an
> open way in decission making).
> 
> @Rene: is there a clean way in how to treat the sqlbox cvs module as add-on
> component to the core gateway module? Please have some thoughts on this issue.
> Generally we should formalize on how such an add-on configure/make/install
> process should look like.
> 
> Stipe
> 
> mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wapme Systems AG
> 
> Vogelsanger Weg 80
> 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> phone: +49.211.74845.0
> fax: +49.211.74845.299
> 
> mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
> http://www.wapme-systems.de/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 


-- 
Alejandro Guerrieri
Magicom
http://www.magicom-bcn.net/