Re: Kannel is suffering

Stipe Tolj, 

>So, how about giving a concret example on how you would do certain issues?
Don't BS me. I have provided several patches to Kannel, and I did submit a working patch
for a feature related to this issue, but about 2½ hour after my submission, you flatly
turned it down. Not much time for deeper contemplation there.

And, please, don't drag the discussion here down to whether that small patch is good or
not. More important issues are at stake. They go way beyond the rejection of a single
patch ie. should Kannel be a 'lowest common denominator' software or should it be a
framework to handle several protocols as 'abstracted' as possible but with provisions
for handling all aspects of a specific protocol.

In my view the latter is a much more useful and challenging point of view.

- Jørgen Thomsen