Re: Kannel is suffering
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Kannel Group |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jørgen Thomsen wrote:
> And, please, don't drag the discussion here down to whether that small patch is good or
> not. More important issues are at stake. They go way beyond the rejection of a single
> patch ie. should Kannel be a 'lowest common denominator' software or should it be a
> framework to handle several protocols as 'abstracted' as possible but with provisions
> for handling all aspects of a specific protocol.
>
> In my view the latter is a much more useful and challenging point of view.
great. At last we agree. Same for me.
[seems at some point now, that a lot of words have been spoken, and basic
opinions haven't been even too far away from eachother]
The "problem" is on how to achieve this idialistic thing.
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------