Re: [RFC] sqlbox as own cvs module - votes please

Hi Stipe,

On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 00:56 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> to gain cvs
> write access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module.
> 
> He is willing to put it under Kannel projection and maintain it inside
> the cvs module. Which would also allow easier participation of other
> developers in interest of it.

I think it's indeed a good idea to provide a new home for Rene's work.
I'm all for it :)

What I'd love to see within the current situation is, from my limited
and little CVS experience, a branch. Maintaining and merging sqlbox as a
patch outside the Kannel source tree is probably a real pain, and I
really appreciate Rene's work.

But I'm against a seperate CVS module, this doesn't seem to be the Right
Way (TM) to do it. A branch would work better and make things much
easier for him (merging and such).

Also, for the long term, I'd like to see sqlbox a part of Kannel, not
somewhere outside. So what Rene needs to keep sqlbox going could be done
in sync with what we have in current source tree. We could make sqlbox
optional with some autoconf magic, but either way, it needs to be
properly documented in users' guide and get `integrated` into Kannel.

Enjoy,
-- 
.O.
..O   Enver ALTIN                   |   http://skyblue.gen.tr/
OOO   Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCEKd9ZCB2FZvqK0sRAuVnAJ0USDq6X4nDKavcesDopX1Z5vnJXgCfQ7sU
oSHq8+vd/I0vHZXeKK0pF4s=
=tLpk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----