Re: Autoconf/Automake patches
Wilfried Goesgens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
uh. fort the cc to the list. ;) On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 05:00:49PM +0300, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > Replying to Wilfried Goesgens: > > yes indeed. lets use svn. there are tree-migration programms arround, > > which do a good job, as i tested last year in our company. > > Complete changesets and history survives the migration. plus you can do > > i.e. a rename of a sourcefile from a client which would be needet to > > cope with some name-clashes in the gwlib/ dir. > > I will gladly do it but I'm not even core developer nor the kannel > site admin, and these admins are already delayuing transition for more > than 9 months > > > So whats the point? > > Well, just for fun :) > > > On the oposit the previous Kannel aproach with the _single_ makefile in the > > root directory did exactly what the author described as the negative tradeoff > > of having one file per subdir: make builds 30 files if it just would need to > > build one. > > Yes I know it. > > > Have you tried the Autoconf/make patch? > > I wrote it! Current automakeized kannel is done by me alone. What > reside in autotools cvs branch is early/preliminary work (as of > sen/oct 2004) with some bugs introduced by Alex Malysh. ah ups ;) i was looking through the ml, as alex told me, and the patch didn't exist on your page anymore, but a complete kannel.tgz, which i took. > > > allso these files aren't dificult to maintain thanks to automake. > > That's the reasoning I've had before I started to do it (except > absolute boredom ...) > > > I think the opinion of the author is as outdated as the paper is. > > No it is not, but it's doesn't matter because kannel is nowhere near > the scale where problem is noticeable. would it be an option to make unneded parts optional? or give them their own configure etc? I've seen stuff like that on more complex projects... i'm working on a newer version of the at-driver. i had turnaround times of more than 5 minutes before aplying the automake patch. with the way it is now, i can directly compile in emacs to spellcheck the code, and have the linemarks which point the textcurser directly to the right direction. > > -- > Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key > This message represents the official view of the voices in my head