Re: rfc - ``httpd'' patch
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Kannel Group |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilan Aelion wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I encountered some problems using gwlib httpd features. In particular, gwlib
> will PANIC when the open file limit is exceeded, which is not acceptable for
> many applications.
can you please point out under which scenarios this is determined?
> Here's a patch that seems to help.
>
> And here's the question: I've added a few retries with a sleep in between in
> put_port_request in http.c.
>
> * Is there really a point in retrying?
> * Is there really a point in sleeping?
> * would it be better to just skip failed requests immediately without
> retrying?
retry'ing on the server side?
what is the scenario of the patch? receiving HTTP clients "before" having
port_collection dict filled with the required keys and hence unable to serve the
request?
At least this is how I "read" the patch.
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------