RE: [RFC] --disable-panics configuration option

We don't disagree that much. Case a) obviously deserves a panic
while case b) should have been a warning right from beginning.

Regards
  Joerg

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Aarno Syvänen [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. März 2005 17:42
An: Pommnitz, Jörg
Cc: Kannel list
Betreff: Re: [RFC] --disable-panics configuration option 


There actually seems to two kinds of panic:

a) Configuration errors. In this case, continuation really is 
impossible.
b) Libs has some sanity checks that cause panic. If we just have a 
broken
      message, we must just ignore message, not panic.

Aarno