Re: [RFC] --disable-panics configuration option
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes. --disable-panics should be only a stopgap. One truly must know what messages are causing the panics. It actually can be just an error of the phone . On 16.3.2005, at 17:52, Jonathan Houser wrote: > > Aarno, > >> There actually seems to two kinds of panic: >> a) Configuration errors. In this case, continuation really is >> impossible. >> b) Libs has some sanity checks that cause panic. If we just have a >> broken >> message, we must just ignore message, not panic. > > I would like it if a panic just wrote the appropriate lines to > the log (for debugging) and kept on running. The panic's I've seen > were for things that pertained to a WDP message from some phone on the > WAP gateway. If that one phone doesn't get his fetch handled, oh > well, we should log that we had a problem and keep on running. So I > like the idea you've proposed. It'd allow everyone to work through > issues without having a wrapper script work overtime. > > Jon >