Re: [RFC] --disable-panics configuration option

Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes. --disable-panics should be only a stopgap. One truly must know
what messages are causing the panics. It actually can be just an error
of the phone .

On 16.3.2005, at 17:52, Jonathan Houser wrote:

>
> 	  Aarno,
>
>> There actually seems to two kinds of panic:
>> a) Configuration errors. In this case, continuation really is 
>> impossible.
>> b) Libs has some sanity checks that cause panic. If we just have a 
>> broken
>>      message, we must just ignore message, not panic.
>
>      I would like it if a panic just wrote the appropriate lines to 
> the log (for debugging) and kept on running.  The panic's I've seen 
> were for things that pertained to a WDP message from some phone on the 
> WAP gateway.  If that one phone doesn't get his fetch handled, oh 
> well, we should log that we had a problem and keep on running.  So I 
> like the idea you've proposed.  It'd allow everyone to work through 
> issues without having a wrapper script work overtime.
>
> Jon
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.