Re: [RFC] --disable-panics configuration option

Yes. And how do you fix bad panics, if Kannel stops running ?
On the other hands, if Kannel goes on normally after a "panic"
you can see there is no reason for it.

I do *not* want to use this option to disable genuine panics,
stemming from misconfiguration. These panics are truly useful,
because they flag configuration errors.

Aarno

On 17.3.2005, at 15:19, Kalle Marjola wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 19:09, "Pommnitz, Jörg" wrote:
>> But this just confirms what I wrote: such a panic is obviously
>> inappropriate and should be replaced by a warning. So, I stand by
>> what I wrote earlier: just audit the panics and make sure Kannel
>> panics in only *REALLY* hopeless situations. This would IMHO be
>> the Right Thing (TM) to do.
>>
> I fully agree here.
>
> It is so bad that Kannel PANICs when it is not really a PANIC 
> situation,
> but we should not make things worse by allowing it to continue when it
> really panics because of some unrecoverable problems
> (I recall rising this issue of 'too easily used panics' many months
> ago..)
>
>
> -- 
>  &Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket
>
>
>