RE: devel Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2

"Hillel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I would really appreciate if the approach would be "just
let it in, and change the behaviour later" as otherwise it may
never get placed in.

Rgds

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: 02 September 2005 13:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: devel Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2


Send devel mailing list submissions to
	[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	[email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
	[email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of devel digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: DATAGRAM MODE (Enver ALTIN)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:35:52 +0300
From: Enver ALTIN <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: DATAGRAM MODE
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"

Hey,

On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 12:05 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
> Count me in! (Now it's 2 Alejandro's ;) ) I've had to change the darn
> ESM_CLASS to DEFAULT about a thousand times :)

I think general consensus is to prevent adding SMSC-specific parameters
to the sendsms interface, so I think this patch is a bit controversial
and needs to be properly designed before it gets committed.

Maybe we can introduce a generic-purpose field and use it for passing
SMSC-specific parameters to the SMSCConn via sendsms? Maybe we can just
let it in, and change the behavior later? I'm not really sure which way
is better.

Hmm...
--
.O.
..O   Enver ALTIN                   |   http://skyblue.gen.tr/
OOO   Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://www.kannel.org/mailman/private/devel/attachments/20050901/279d77fc/at
tachment-0001.bin

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


End of devel Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2
************************************
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.