Re: Limits of kannel

"Mario Noboa" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <00b601c5b972$aa520740$153fa8c0@teampc02>
Hi Stipe, few days ago i did a stress test with an operator, kannel worked
very well with 30 msg/s. But i had problems with more than 40 msg/s in a
smpp conexion. I set throughput=6 and max-pending-submits=50 but didn't
work.

This error appears for each messange sent:

2005-09-02 11:15:51 [11943] [11] WARNING: SMPP[COM]: SMSC sent
submit_sm_resp with wrong sequence number 0x0001001d

I have a CPU system with 2 Gb and 1200 MHz. How would i configure kannel for
this stress test?

Thanks for your help.

Mario


-----Mensaje original-----
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:19:12 +0200
From: Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Limits of kannel
To: Douglas Jurcovichi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Douglas Jurcovichi wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
>
> What is the maximum traffic per SMPP port have you been worked (msg/s) ?

on a "normal" hardware machine, meaning single CPU system with 500MB-to-1GB
RAM
and a 800-1200 MHz CPU (P4) you should do several thousand msg/sec...

actually our local benchmarks on a more reliable server got up to 4000
msg/sec.
over 2-3 SMPP ports.

Actually Kannel is high-performative. The bottle-neck will _ALWAYS_ be the
upstream SMSC links itself.

Stipe

mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme-group.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299

mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.