Re: [PATCH] DLR with field_dst not supported in Mysql/Pgsql

Guillaume Cottenceau <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Stipe Tolj <st 'at' tolj.org> writes:

> Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > P.S. I find MNC's solution acceptable too but it need more user
> > configuration.
> 
> yep, I like the "idea" in it's base too, since it "assumes" that
> Kannel does has it's own MSISDN format scheme, which we should have
> actually.
> 
> But I dislike the fact that user's may "forget" to use the
> unified-prefix within the smsc groups and also that they are "not
> aware" of the fact they would need one.

We could totally say that in next version of Kannel, not
specifying a unified-prefix in an smsc group gives a startup
error. More features usually mean more configuration/complexity
in software, this is acceptable (as long as we try to keep it as
simple/logical as possible).

We can also say that it is not a startup error, but it would give
a big bold warning when receiving a DLR if it's missing - after
all, not everyone wants/needs/can receive DLRs.
 
> So, I'd go first for Alex's way in stripping away everything that
> seems logically to be country code or/and prefix, reducing the
> probability that the same base MSISDN number is transported via the
> same smsc-id in the same timestamp very drastically for various
> country/network code variations.
> 
> This is still no perfect solution IMO. Since it's still not fully fail safe.

The Kannel group has been very reluctant in half-fixing this
problem over the past 4 years (look at the large number of
submitted patches that were refused). I'd find surprising that
the policy would change now :)

I'm very much in favor of a complete/full solution.

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.