Re: configuring for Mac

Cesar Gutierrez Corea <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Agree, I think it should detect the architecture and build for that  
architecture, we could have separates binaries packages for PowerPC  
and Intel for distribution. It would be convenient, for example por  
DarwinPorts or Fink to have just one Universal package that you can  
download and run on both platforms, but if the conflicts with -M flag  
can't be solved I don't see the problem of having 2 packages. Don't  
know how the rest of the open source available for the Mac is going  
to handle this thing Universal.

On Jan 12, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote:

> Cesar Gutierrez Corea wrote:
>
>> Stipe,
>> They are in the specific configuration for *apple-darwin* in   
>> configure.in, I think the purpose of those flags is that if  
>> configure  finds the SDK to build Universal Binaries (PPC and  
>> i386) it will use  it, but this flags has a conflict with -MM  
>> option (since it can only  be used with one architecture).
>> "gcc: -E, -S, -save-temps and -M options are not allowed with   
>> multiple -arch flags"
>
> ok, yep... I see now.
>
> I have the same on Darwin Kernel Version 8.3.0.
>
> Ok, so Andreas (afink) added this "feature" in:
>
> http://www.kannel.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/configure.in.diff? 
> r1=1.153&r2=1.154
>
> ;)
>
> Why should be try to build universal (multi-arch) binaries here?
> Nice to have, but nothing really required here, since we build  
> obviously for the desired architecture at runtime.
>
> Stipe
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Cesar Gutierrez Corea
Software Engineer
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.