Re: [patch] RE: immediate-sendsms-reply

Hi,

I must confirm that we _need_ to commit the proposed patch either in
current or modified behaviour since the bug still remains in current
CVS head.

On 3/22/05, Kalle Marjola <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:11, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kalle Marjola wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I though over this and a bit updated your patch so that it only
> > > waits if there are 'partially handled HTTP request' in the air (i.e. has
> > > already sent the message onward to bearerbox but has not yet stored the
> > > http client into disctionary). Moreover, the processing time between
> > > sending the message to bb and saving the client into dictionary has been
> > > minimized..
> >
> > why not first put http client into dictionary and then send msg to
> > bearerbox?
> >
> I thought about that and did not do that way because that would overload
> several functions with a list of new parameters,
>
>
> --
>  &Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket
>
>
>


--
Dziugas