Re: Request: rev. 1.11 to dlr_mysql.c

Dear Tom,

Yes, we had a long discussion on that issue. (check it on the archives)
But the main problem is that the patch does't work when using prefix.
We need to find a solution, but it's still pending...

The problem is located on the fact that EMI/UCP is using the same TS in a second.
SMPP protocol seems to work in a different way (TS are unique)

regards

--
Telemaque - NICE - (FR)
Service Technique - Developpement
http://www.telemaque.fr/
[email protected]
Tel : +33 4 93 97 71 64 (fax 68)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Sommer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:20 AM
Subject: Request: rev. 1.11 to dlr_mysql.c


> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm having problems with DLR reports getting mixed up.
> Basically I am getting DLR where the contents of the ANSWER (%A) doesn't
> match the number (%P). In the answer from the SMSC there is mentioned a
> totally different number than the value of %P, which means the Answer
> doesn't match the Number, which renders DLR useless.
> 
> I noticed the only thing you use to differentiate which report URL goes
> where, is the timestamp and the SMSC, this doesn't seem viable, since two
> SMS sent from the same SMSC in the same second, would create conflicts.
> 
> Looking at revision 1.11 of dlr_mysql.c, it seems this patch might solve
> my problem, however it was backed out.
> 
> Could you perhaps shed some light on this?
> http://kannel.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gw/dlr_mysql.c.diff?r1=1.10&r2=1.11
> 
> Regards
> -- 
> Tom Sommer
> 
> 
> Regards
> -- 
> Tom Sommer
> http://tomsommer.dk
> 
> 
>