Re: Diagnosing problem with submission of MTs from Kannel's store file...

Giulio Harding <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Organization m.Net Corporation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sorry, just noticed that the problem I originally described was slightly 
different - I have yet to confirm whether that original problem is still 
present with Kannel CVS, but this latest 'throughput' issue definitely is.

Giulio Harding wrote:
> Ok, compile Kannel from CVS (vs-20060509), and deployed it in production 
> after some basic testing - all seems well so far.
> 
> Details:
> 
> Kannel bearerbox version `cvs-20060509'. Build `May 30 2006 17:37:39', 
> compiler `3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)'. System Linux, release 
> 2.4.20-19.8smp, version #1 SMP Tue Jul 15 15:01:43 EDT 2003, machine 
> i686. Hostname vesuvius, IP 10.100.123.135. Libxml version 2.6.9. Using 
> OpenSSL 0.9.6b [engine] 9 Jul 2001. Using native malloc.
> 
> However, the 'throughput' problem still exists - here is the 
> configuration for one of our binds:
> 
> # Vodafone SMSC. Free MT services
> # This SMPP account is for all new free MT services provisioned through 
> MPAPS
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> smsc-id = vodafonefrmt
> host = 202.81.65.20
> port = 3403
> transceiver-mode = true
> smsc-username = xxx
> smsc-password = yyy
> system-type = VMA
> address-range = 0
> source-addr-ton = 3
> source-addr-npi = 9
> dest-addr-ton = 1
> dest-addr-npi = 1
> alt-charset="ASCII"
> enquire-link-interval = 30
> allowed-smsc-id = "vodafonefrmt"
> throughput = 13
> 
> Upon starting Kannel, I see this in the bearer.log:
> 
> 2006-05-31 23:41:42 [18565] [0] INFO: Set throughput to 13.000 for smsc 
> id <vodafonefrmt>
> 
> If I send a batch of 100 MTs through Kannel, to that SMSC, they are all 
> sent at once, which triggers the following response from the SMSC:
> 
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:56:49 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:57:13 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:57:13 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> 2006-05-31 23:57:13 [18590] [10] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated 
> string has no NULL.
> 2006-05-31 23:57:14 [18590] [10] ERROR: SMPP[vodafonefrmt]: SMSC 
> returned error code 0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
> ...
> 
> etc. for the next 5 minutes or so. Each minute, Kannel tries to send the 
> all the queued MTs at once, and a small number get through before the 
> throttling condition is triggered, and the SMSC stops accepting MTs. 
> After about 5 minutes, all hundred MTs did eventually get through, but 
> this is hardly ideal - in cases of high load, it could take many many 
> hours for all the messages to trickle through.
> 
> So:
> 
> - the throughput parameter is not honoured for MTs submitted to Kannel 
> via HTTP
> - the throughput parameter is not honoured for MTs delivered from 
> Kannel's queue/store
> 
> Have I interpreted the situation correctly? Has anyone else encountered 
> this problem? Let me know if I should provide any other info...
> 
> One thing - Vincent's email, with subject '[REQUEST] EMI/UCP + 
> throttling: Need beta-testers' - this sounds like it might be 
> applicable, but I'm not 100% sure - what does EMI/UCP mean?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Malysh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would advice you to try CVS head version. It contains numerous bug 
>> fixes all over the place. Please try it and report when the problem 
>> persist.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> Giulio Harding schrieb:
>>> Hi, this is my first post to the Kannel Devel mailing list (and I've 
>>> only been subscribed for maybe a month or so), so please excuse any 
>>> cluelessness on my part...
>>>
>>> We're becoming quite reliant on Kannel because of significant 
>>> problems with our old SMS gateway, and a new SMS gateway we're trying 
>>> to migrate to.
>>>
>>> As such, I have a fairly urgent need to diagnose and resolve an issue 
>>> that's cropped up a few times, with regards to Kannel's handling of 
>>> MTs that are queued to its message store file.
>>>
>>> The problem is this:
>>>
>>> An SMPP link to a carrier goes down, for one reason or another, and 
>>> MTs submitted to Kannel are queued in its store file. When the link 
>>> comes back up (responds to bind requests again), *one* MT is 
>>> submitted, but the rest of the queued MTs are *not* submitted, 
>>> despite the bearer.log indicating (for sets of 10 MTs at a time) 
>>> "WARNING: SMPP[optuschmt]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit. 
>>> SENT<90>sec. ago, SEQ<110>, DST<61402276846>" etc. (I've checked this 
>>> with Etheral, monitoring traffic to the SMSC's IP address and port - 
>>> only one SMPP submit_sm exchange occurs)
>>>
>>> Also, all further MTs submitted to Kannel for that SMPP link will 
>>> queue, even though the link is up (and responding to bind enquiries).
>>>
>>> If I restart Kannel, again, *one* MT will be submitted, and that's 
>>> it, and MTs will continue to queue.
>>>
>>> The only way to resolve this, so far, is to stop Kannel, move its 
>>> store file (and backup) aside, and restart Kannel so it has an empty 
>>> store. Subsequent MTs are submitted fine, and don't queue.
>>>
>>> I then have to parse the original store file and manually resend 
>>> those MTs that were not submitted before.
>>>
>>> This is a huge problem when we are experiencing heavy traffic, and it 
>>> can sometimes take hours to resolve.
>>>
>>> This is with Kannel 1.4.0 running on Redhat 8.0 (let me know if I 
>>> should provide extra info, e.g. SMSC connection configuration, log 
>>> excerpts etc.)
>>>
>>> I am currently trying to replicate this problem on a test setup, but 
>>> I wanted to check with people on the mailing list for any advice. Has 
>>> anyone else encountered this problem? What are the chances of getting 
>>> some help to diagnose & fix it? I (and some colleagues) have passable 
>>> C skills, but any tips on where I should start to diagnose the 
>>> problem would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Giulio Harding
Systems Administrator

m.Net Corporation
Level 13, 99 Gawler Place
Adelaide SA 5000, Australia

Tel: +61 8 8210 2041
Fax: +61 8 8211 9620
Mobile: 0432 876 733
MSN: [email protected]

http://www.mnetcorporation.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.