Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

Hi Stipe,

On 6/14/06, Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> wrote:

> that's a problem indeed. AFAIU the smsbox connects to the sqlbox rather then the
> bearerbox port. So sqlbox acts (from the view of smsbox) as bearerbox.
>
> Ok, that's why you guys need to seperate and add the config. But I think you
> should use a different .conf file for sqlbox, where the "normal bearerbox port"
> is set addequate to reflect the sqlbox(bearerbox)-port. This is a benefit, since
> it doesn't require to patch smsbox at all. Right?
>
> So, using 2 configs with core groups different for bearerbox port would solve
> the smsbox patching need.
>

I don't see how a different config file *only* for sqlbox will solve
anything since smsbox is who needs bearerbox port to connect. If we
use a different .conf file *only* for sqlbox, smsbox would still
connecting to original bearerbox-port.

If we take this way, maybe a very ugly solution is to start smsbox and
sqlbox with one config file and bearerbox with other but i don't like
this way.

M