Re: Compiling kannel with -Wall option

On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:03 +0200, Colin Pitrat wrote:
> I added the -Wall option to CFLAGS, and I add a lot of warnings. I know 
> this doesn't mean that there are errors, but it could hide some. Maybe 
> it would be nice to enable this flag and to try to correct some of these 
> warnings don't you think ?

I tried to pursue this a while ago with no luck. I guess at the time
gwlib was developed, gcc wasn't this smart to notice pointer signedness
issues. If you try it with gcc 3.x, you won't see many warnings but it
will spit out quite a lot of them with gcc 4.x.

I remember guessing about roots of the problem, somewhere around the
octstr code or even deeper. I wonder why Kannel did not use glib in the
first place and reinvented the wheel. Licensing issues, maybe? Hrm.
-- 
.O.
..O   Enver ALTIN                   |   http://enveraltin.com/
OOO   Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFLfveZCB2FZvqK0sRAphJAJ0c8g20lAA3rjWE2QvZmhM67ARKJwCdH9xp
ZEnUZfUNEHLLNvbuUy6mEj8=
=mZBb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----