Re: configurable max retries forgotten in 1.41 =(

Hi,

yep, you are right we must fix it. But we should think of all possible  
implications and fix it right.
I will try to fix it right...

Thanks,
Alex

Am 18.10.2006, 22:58 Uhr, schrieb Dziugas Baltrunas <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> when I replied to your post, I was referring to your thread regarding
> resend_try and sms_resend_frequency for split messages in particular:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05943.html
>
> This has been never fixed until now even if we have separate threads
> for the same issue on the mailing list.
>
> @Stipe, @Alex?
>
> On 10/18/06, Josh McAllister <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Actually I have to eat some serious crow here. I checked out 1.41
>> instead of 1.4.1 and did a quick scan of the src for evidence of the
>> patch and of course it wasn't in there. Got the appropriate 1.4.1 and it
>> IS of course in there. Sorry for the false alarm. =/ Perhaps this should
>> be highlighted in the Changes file though.?
>>
>> Thanks for getting it in!
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dziugas Baltrunas [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:59 AM
>> > To: Josh McAllister
>> > Cc: Kannel Devel
>> > Subject: Re: configurable max retries forgotten in 1.41 =(
>> >
>> > Hi, Josh,
>> >
>> > I completely agree with you. This never ending retry mechanism is not
>> > only flooding logs, but also causing tons of problems for those
>> > involved in maintenance of SMSCs or SMPP servers.
>> >
>> > There is also one similar thread together with the bug report
>> > "pending", you may take a lot at it here:
>> >
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06060.html
>> >
>> > I would suggest to at least fix it in a "dirty" fashion rather then
>> > waiting months for an "elegant" solution.
>> >
>> > On 10/17/06, Josh McAllister <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > To be frank, I'm amazed that this issue hasn't gotten more attention
>> > > over the years given the default behavior of retrying immediately,
>> and
>> > > indefinitely. I don't know of any SMSC's that take kindly to that
>> kind
>> > > of behavior.
>> > >
>> > > I proposed a patch back in 7/05 that fixed this for smpp, followed
>> by a
>> > > more appropriate patch submitted (10/26/05) and later committed
>> > > (11/8/05) by Alexander Malysh that fixed the problem for all protos.
>> > >
>> > > Is there a consensus that this is a critical issue? How is not a
>> > > critical issue? What are the chances that we can get another release
>> in
>> > > the very near future?
>> > >
>> > > As always kudos to the devs, this really is a monster of a project.
>> So
>> > > many modalities, I can only imagine how difficult it is to keep up
>> with
>> > > it all.
>> > >
>> > > Josh McAllister
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Hillel [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > > > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:53 AM
>> > > > To: Kannel Devel
>> > > > Cc: [email protected]
>> > > > Subject: 3 patches seem to be forgotten
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > There are 3 patches that seem to be forgotten and we were wondered
>> if
>> > > they
>> > > > can be added:
>> > > >
>> > > > 1)Noor Entertainment [[email protected]] sent in on
>> Date:
>> > > Wed,
>> > > > 12
>> > > > Jul 2006 02:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
>> > > > " Please find attached a small patch against
>> > > > gateway/gw/wap_push_ppg.c allowing to set the Wap Push
>> > > > sender by using the 'X-Kannel-From' HTTP header when
>> > > > submitting the Wap Push request to the Kannel PPG"
>> > > >
>> > > > It was not sent with the word PATCH in front so maybe it was
>> missed.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2)Colin Pitrat <[email protected]> sent in a patch and then
>> > > refered to
>> > > > it again on Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:24:40 +0200
>> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] empty SMS replaced by default message
>> > > >
>> > > > This can be useful if you need to send an empty SMS to a customer.
>> > > >
>> > > > 3)"Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]> sent in an awesome patch
>> on
>> > > > Date:
>> > > > Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:35:37 +0200  with the Subject: [PATH] convert
>> > > internal
>> > > > charset to UTF-8.  Becides the few changes from Peter this would
>> be
>> > > great
>> > > > to
>> > > > have in CVS, as it allows all the possible charset values.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Rgds
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dziugas
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Thanks,
Alex