Re: Interesting issue with DLRs
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | tolj.org system architecture |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Fink wrote:
> In this case the solution is to use a SINGLE session instead one for
> receive and one for transmit.
yep, a TRX (transceier) session may be used here...
But this has no implications to the logical PDU flow. The SMSC could still
behace like this:
ESME SMSC
-submit_sm->
<-deliver_dm-
<-submit_sm_rep-
and we still won't handle the DLR corretly in kannel since we simply think "this
is an unknown DLR for me".
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------