Re: Interesting issue with DLRs

Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Organization tolj.org system architecture
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Andreas,

Andreas Fink wrote:

> In this case the solution is to use a SINGLE session instead one for  
> receive and one for transmit.

yep, a TRX (transceier) session may be used here...

But this has no implications to the logical PDU flow. The SMSC could still 
behace like this:

ESME                SMSC
      -submit_sm->
     <-deliver_dm-
     <-submit_sm_rep-

and we still won't handle the DLR corretly in kannel since we simply think "this 
is an unknown DLR for me".

Stipe

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/

mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.