Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support
"Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <03bb01c6f8e7$e472cb20$9600a8c0@vince> |
The link provided is not reachable. Could you please, attach the patch to the ML? Vincent. -- Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR) Service Technique/Reseau - NOC Developpement SMS/MMS/Kiosques http://www.telemaque.fr/ [email protected] Tel : +33 4 92 90 99 84 (fax 9142) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support > Hi, > > any objections or I go to commit this patch? > > Am 17.10.2006, 18:20 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> please find at https://olek.homeip.net/~alex/store-spool.patch patch >> that adds additinaly support for store spool directory. >> I added two new config options: >> 'store-type' - allow us to define which type to use (file, spool) >> 'store-location' - allow setting either file or spool location >> >> Option 'store-file' is deprecated but still supported with a warning >> that two above options should be used. >> By default if no 'store-type' defined store file is used. >> >> Advantages of the store spool is: >> 1) each message stored as one file, so it's easier to drop one specific >> message from the queue >> 2) no need to have queued messages twice in the memory >> 3) no locking required -> no race conditions as is the case for store >> file >> 4) some other that I don't know yet :) >> >> Please test it and give me feedback. >> >> Note: you should use store spool on the drive with jurnaled filesystem >> otherwise it's really slow (best results I reached with reiserfs). >> >> Note2: I was unable to upload patch to kannel.org so if my devel machine >> not reachable don't worry just retry later. >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > Alex > > >