Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support

Hi Alex,

On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 18:20 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> please find at https://olek.homeip.net/~alex/store-spool.patch patch that  
> adds additinaly support for store spool directory.
> I added two new config options:
> 'store-type' - allow us to define which type to use (file, spool)
> 'store-location' - allow setting either file or spool location
> 
> Option 'store-file' is deprecated but still supported with a warning that  
> two above options should be used.
> By default if no 'store-type' defined store file is used.
> 
> Advantages of the store spool is:
> 1) each message stored as one file, so it's easier to drop one specific  
> message from the queue
> 2) no need to have queued messages twice in the memory
> 3) no locking required -> no race conditions as is the case for store file
> 4) some other that I don't know yet :)
> 
> Please test it and give me feedback.

Sorry for the delay. I have briefly read over the patch, and it looks
good to me (that means I'm +1).

I wonder why don't we just use a database. Hrm. Maybe I'll give it a try
sometime.
-- 
.O.
..O   Enver ALTIN                   |   http://enveraltin.com/
OOO   Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFQKDRZCB2FZvqK0sRAqshAJ0VNYjTWXcwwqvsAwo7UKHcTt0V9ACfTfAs
N2WPLQL4narsN+HDB0tqnS4=
=Erc3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----