Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support

What is the load performance like with this patch?,
I know with the store file, and the queue grows quite large,eg maybe 30,000+
store size (it is ram dependent),
 if m/c doesn't have the physical ram to do the
store_dump process, your kannel is very quickly in quicksand.............
Fred


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support


> IHO, we need more that "++1 seems to work"
>
> This patch is pretty long and should not be voted with reason "it seems
ok"
> We need to compile it, test it, and completely understand what every lines
> are doing.
>
> Trivial issues are not affected to this (means less 10 lines of diffs).
>
> regards
>
> Vincent.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Enver ALTIN" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support
>
>
>
>