Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL DLR speedup
"Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <103d01c707fd$2eec31e0$9600a8c0@vince> |
This is *NOT* true on UCP/EMI protocol for exemple. Vincent. -- Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR) Service Technique/Reseau - NOC Developpement SMS/MMS/Kiosques http://www.telemaque.fr/ [email protected] Tel : +33 4 92 90 99 84 (fax 9142) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Georg von Zezschwitz" <[email protected]> To: "Andreas Fink" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>; "Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL DLR speedup > Andreas Fink schrieb: >> >> This was not about LIMIT 1 (there was a reason for that) but about >> doing DELETE and SELECT in one statement. >> The LIMIT 1 was a workaround in the error of EMI protocol not giving >> unique timestamps. >> the timestamp on a SMSC is not unique, not even for one destination >> number. > Hi Andreas, > > I believe and observed the opposite. The SMSC increments the timestamp - > even in the same second - if 2 messages are delivered to the same > destination number within the same second. > > Are you really sure about this? > > Georg > > > >