Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL DLR speedup

"Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <103d01c707fd$2eec31e0$9600a8c0@vince>
This is *NOT* true on UCP/EMI protocol for exemple.

Vincent.
 
--
Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR)
Service Technique/Reseau - NOC 
Developpement SMS/MMS/Kiosques
http://www.telemaque.fr/
[email protected]
Tel : +33 4 92 90 99 84 (fax 9142)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Georg von Zezschwitz" <[email protected]>
To: "Andreas Fink" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; "Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL DLR speedup


> Andreas Fink schrieb:
>>
>> This was not about LIMIT 1 (there was a reason for that) but about 
>> doing DELETE  and SELECT in one statement.
>> The LIMIT 1 was a workaround in the error of EMI protocol not giving 
>> unique timestamps.
>> the timestamp on a SMSC is not unique, not even for one destination 
>> number.
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> I believe and observed the opposite. The SMSC increments the timestamp - 
> even in the same second - if 2 messages are delivered to the same 
> destination number within the same second.
> 
> Are you really sure about this?
> 
> Georg
> 
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.