Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL DLR speedup

"Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <124b01c70898$97dbe3d0$9600a8c0@vince>
Ok the question now is: Can we broke the <= v7 user's compatibility
Obviously not.

Vincent

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andreas Fink" <[email protected]>
To: "Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL DLR speedup


> postgres does support LIMIT 1 in version 8.
> 
> On 15.11.2006, at 01:58, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> 
>> Am 14.11.2006, 14:36 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Fink <[email protected]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On 10.11.2006, at 18:52, Georg von Zezschwitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alexander Malysh schrieb:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andreas , this is not true what you say. Mysql use LIMIT 1 in  
>>>>> delete and update. Postgres should use oid because there is not  
>>>>> limit support.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> This was not about LIMIT 1 (there was a reason for that) but about  
>>> doing DELETE  and SELECT in one statement.
>>> The LIMIT 1 was a workaround in the error of EMI protocol not  
>>> giving unique timestamps.
>>> the timestamp on a SMSC is not unique, not even for one  
>>> destination number.
>>
>> Postgres doesn't support LIMIT 1 so there no way except with  
>> subselect to tell postgres to delete only one row.
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.