Re: [PATCH] Re: MO Concatenation

On 09.01.2007, at 08:59, Δημήτρης Ευμορφόπουλος  
wrote:

> So you mean msisdn + refnum + smsc-group-id not smscid ... That is  
> valid!

well group-id seems to be new and I have not looked at this part for  
a while.
but sounds logical.

> BTW, what do you think that the time-to-live for each part should  
> be? We show that anything over 3 minutes is already too much.
>
3 minutes doesnt sound that wrong to me. You must consider an  
incoming SMS from a SIM card where the second part cant be hit  
because the phone was processing the first part (yes there are still  
bogous SMSC's out there) so the second part would deliver as retry a  
few minutes later. This can be even 10 minutes. Maybe make it default  
to 3 minutes and make it uer configurable.

> Dimitris Evmorfopoulos
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:45 PM
> To: Δημήτρης Ευμορφόπουλος
> Cc: [email protected]; Alexander Malysh
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: MO Concatenation
>
>
> On 08.01.2007, at 17:38, Δημήτρης Ευμορφόπουλος
> wrote:
>
>> The triple key is not valid. From personal experience I was getting
>> the SMS parts from all SMSC's not the one that transmitted the
>> first part only. All the operators I worked with do the same thing.
>> So the key should remain msisdn + refnum only.
>
> msisdn + refnum + smscid.
>
> multiple SMSC's behaving the same are / must be grouped in the same
> smsc-id for DLR consolidation too.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>