Re: [PATCH] Re: MO Concatenation
Paul Bagyenda <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
So we have some sort of agreement, except that I can't seem to find any reference to 'smsc-group-id' in the conf or the structure, so I shall use smscid instead. A new patch will be forthcoming once I have successfully fought a few local fires! P. On Jan 09, 2007, at 11:08, Andreas Fink wrote: > > > On 09.01.2007, at 08:59, Δημήτρης Ευμορφόπουλος > wrote: > >> So you mean msisdn + refnum + smsc-group-id not smscid ... That is >> valid! > > well group-id seems to be new and I have not looked at this part > for a while. > but sounds logical. > >> BTW, what do you think that the time-to-live for each part should >> be? We show that anything over 3 minutes is already too much. >> > 3 minutes doesnt sound that wrong to me. You must consider an > incoming SMS from a SIM card where the second part cant be hit > because the phone was processing the first part (yes there are > still bogous SMSC's out there) so the second part would deliver as > retry a few minutes later. This can be even 10 minutes. Maybe make > it default to 3 minutes and make it uer configurable. > >> Dimitris Evmorfopoulos >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:45 PM >> To: Δημήτρης Ευμορφόπουλος >> Cc: [email protected]; Alexander Malysh >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: MO Concatenation >> >> >> On 08.01.2007, at 17:38, Δημήτρης Ευμορφόπουλος >> wrote: >> >>> The triple key is not valid. From personal experience I was getting >>> the SMS parts from all SMSC's not the one that transmitted the >>> first part only. All the operators I worked with do the same thing. >>> So the key should remain msisdn + refnum only. >> >> msisdn + refnum + smscid. >> >> multiple SMSC's behaving the same are / must be grouped in the same >> smsc-id for DLR consolidation too. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >