Re: Weird problem: bind to carrier fails, kannel stops responding - but bind is still listed as 'online'

"Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

please set log-level = 0 in your core group and post debug log so we can  
see what happened.

Am 29.01.2007, 08:22 Uhr, schrieb Giulio Harding  
<[email protected]>:

> This is a moderately urgent problem, since it's recently cropped up on a  
> bind to carrier that carries a reasonable amount of traffic, and after  
> some investigation, we have NO idea what's going wrong. This has  
> happened 3 or 4 times over the past month - the bind had been performing  
> flawlessly up until this point. In previous occurrences of this problem,  
> the problem has gone away after some time (e.g. a few hours, or a day or  
> two), but we're worried the problem will reappear just when we're due to  
> handle large peaks in traffic. (We've been lucky so far)
>
> The problem is as follows: at some point, we noticed the bind had one MT  
> in the store, and no MOs were arriving on that bind. However, the bind  
> was still listed as 'online'. We tried restarting Kannel, and that bind  
> would come up again, and the queued MT would be sent to the destination  
> handset, but wouldn't leave the queue, and wouldn't be marked as sent by  
> Kannel. Again, no MOs would arrive on that bind, even though it seemed  
> to be up. Sometimes, one or two MOs might arrive, and one or two MTs  
> might be successfully sent, but then that bind would seize up again,  
> with an MT in the store, and no further MOs or MTs would be
>
> A packet capture during a Kannel restart then shutdown showed that after  
> the initial successful bind, there would be one or two successful  
> submit_sms, but then nothing - no enquire_links, no responses to  
> deliver_sms sent by the SMSC, etc. - just occasional TCP keep-alives.  
> Each time Kannel is restarted, the same queued messages would be  
> successfully submitted, but not removed from the queue.
>
> Here's a sample packet capture summary:
>
> No.     Time        Source                Destination           Protocol  
> Info
>       26 15.747608   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [SYN] Seq=0 Len=0 MSS=1360 TSV=2576408299  
> TSER=0 WS=2
>       30 15.788987   xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> TCP      copysnap > 35085 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=61440 Len=0  
> MSS=1436 WS=0
>       31 15.788998   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=5440 Len=0
>       32 15.789142   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> SMPP     SMPP Bind_transceiver
>       42 15.830586   xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> SMPP     SMPP Bind_transceiver - resp: "Ok"
>       43 15.830595   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=45 Ack=28 Win=5440 Len=0
>       44 15.831265   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> SMPP     SMPP Submit_sm
>       51 15.939520   xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> TCP      copysnap > 35085 [ACK] Seq=28 Ack=175 Win=61266 Len=0
>       54 16.016723   xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> SMPP     SMPP Submit_sm - resp: "Ok"
>       55 16.056163   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=73 Win=5440 Len=0
>       60 20.344091   xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> SMPP     SMPP Deliver_sm
>       61 20.344105   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=145 Win=5440 Len=0
>       80 80.089288   xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive] copysnap > 35085 [ACK] Seq=144 Ack=174  
> Win=32768 Len=1
>       81 80.089299   10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive ACK] 35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=145  
> Win=5440 Len=0
>      107 139.857528  xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive] copysnap > 35085 [ACK] Seq=144 Ack=174  
> Win=32768 Len=1
>      108 139.857543  10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive ACK] 35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=145  
> Win=5440 Len=0
>      109 153.240014  xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> SMPP     SMPP Deliver_sm
>      110 153.240029  10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=315 Win=6512 Len=0
>      129 212.573429  xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive] copysnap > 35085 [ACK] Seq=314 Ack=174  
> Win=32768 Len=1
>      130 212.573442  10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive ACK] 35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=315  
> Win=6512 Len=0
>      156 272.340457  xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive] copysnap > 35085 [ACK] Seq=314 Ack=174  
> Win=32768 Len=1
>      157 272.340467  10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      [TCP Keep-Alive ACK] 35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=315  
> Win=6512 Len=0
>      167 314.727055  xxx.xx.xx.xx          10.110.123.31          
> SMPP     SMPP Deliver_sm
>      168 314.727069  10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [ACK] Seq=175 Ack=383 Win=6512 Len=0
>      178 337.665939  10.110.123.31         xxx.xx.xx.xx           
> TCP      35085 > copysnap [RST, ACK] Seq=175 Ack=383 Win=6512 Len=0
>
> You can see the successful transciever bind (packet #'s 32, 42), the  
> successful submit_sm (44, 54), the ignored deliver_sm (60, and again at  
> 109 and 167), all the TCP keep-alives, no enquire-links, and a final RST  
> as kannel is restarted (no unbind?)
>
> The TCP stream immediately after the restart, for the same bind is  
> pretty much identical. Bind_transciever, submit_sm, then nothing.
>
> The message in the queue is:
>
> SMS ID					Type		Time			Sender		Receiver	SMSC ID	BOX ID	UDH	Message
> ----
> aa37aeef-1db0-494b-bfdc-7f574f5a9263	MT-REPLY	2007-01-29 16:37:11	 
> 19xxxxxx	614xxxxxxxx	xxxx			<79 character text message that is being  
> sent fine across all other binds, and was sent fine through this bind  
> before the problem>
>
> There are no messages in the bearer.log related to the problem bind.
>
>
> So:
>
> Firstly, are there any debug options or advanced logging I can turn on  
> to try and find out what Kannel is doing with this bind? Secondly, does  
> anyone have any ideas what the issue might be?
>
> We're running Kannel version `cvs-20060727' - Build `Sep 21 2006  
> 14:42:06', compiler `3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)'. System Linux,  
> release 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp, version #1 SMP Wed Aug 23 13:38:27 BST 2006,  
> machine x86_64. Hostname smsgw2.appgw.mnetcorporation.com, IP  
> 10.110.123.31. Libxml version 2.6.16. Using native malloc.
>
> We haven't yet had a chance to move to 1.4.1 (our test/build servers are  
> being serviced) but from keeping an eye on the dev mailing list, I don't  
> think we've missed any critical patches...? In any case, since this CVS  
> build, we've had no problems until now.
>
> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!
>
> --
> Giulio Harding
> Systems Administrator
>
> m.Net Corporation
> Level 2, 16 Leigh Street
> Adelaide SA 5000, Australia
>
> Tel: +61 8 8210 2041
> Fax: +61 8 8211 9620
> Mobile: 0432 876 733
> MSN: [email protected]
>
> http://www.mnetcorporation.com
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Thanks,
Alex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.