Fwd: [PATCH] dlr-group-id : Multiple SMSCs and a DLR group

Guys,

I have been using this for nearly a month now in production without  
any problems.

Is there any reason why it should not be committed to CVS?

Regards

Ben

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Ben Suffolk <[email protected]>
> Date: 29 January 2007 13:26:30 GMT
> To: Ben Suffolk <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kannel Development list <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH] dlr-group-id : Multiple SMSCs and a DLR group
>
>> I think a simple fix would be to have another field say dlr-id,  
>> which if not set would default to the smsc-id. This field would  
>> then be used for the smsc name in the dlr tables. This way you can  
>> group multiple smscs into a logical dlr group, but still have  
>> individual control over them.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this before I have a go at implementing it?
>
> Well I got no responses in the negative to this idea, so I have  
> implemented it.
>
> This patch allows you to add a config option to the smsc group  
> called dlr-group-id, this lets you have several SMSCs with  
> different id's grouped together so that they can share DLR data.  
> i.e. in the situation that you send a message via one SMSC and get  
> the DLR back via the other but you want to allow all the SMSCs to  
> have different id's for control / logging purposes.
>
> If you do not specify dlr-group-id in the config is uses smsc-id as  
> before.
>
>

> Regards
>
> Ben